Pesquisar este blog

[aStro-LáBio]°² = [diáRio de boRdo]°²

o tempo de uma gaveta aberta
é o tempo de uso de uma gaveta aberta
é o tempo de uma gaveta em uso
agora fechada a gaveta guarda
o tempo para trás levou
e não volta mais: voou





para chegar até lá, siga a seta vermelha:

ctrl + c -> aeromancia.blogspot.com -> ctrl + v -> barra de endereços -> enter



érica zíngano | francine jallageas | ícaro lira | lucas parente

terça-feira, 1 de junho de 2010

auto consciência.

Reinaldo Laddaga: It all depends. Much of online publishing follows the model of print. In these cases (as when a paper is distributed in Word or PDF format), I don’t think that the difference in terms of practices of reading is particularly big. Of course, there are lots of productions for the Internet that can’t be read at all as if they were printed. There are objects in the Internet (I’m thinking of online games, for example) to which it would be unproductive and even absurd to relate as readers. Something similar could be said about the question of authorship: the Internet allows for the distribution of objects authored in a perfectly traditional way. It also allows for (one could even say that it is uniquely suited to) collaborative practices of various kinds, from the production of texts by large collectives (like the Italian collective Wu Ming to new ways of articulating complex fluxes of discourse and image coming from heterogeneous sources in some blogs. extract